Dr.Douglas Kirkpatrick
3226 North Park Street
Buckeye AZ 85396-8388
October 31, 2022
Thank you for returning my phone call. I greatly appreciate your willingness to consider what I have to tell you.
:
I do NOT need or want or expect you to agree, explain or provide any evidence or information - all the information is already in Oregon Medical Board (OMB) records.
:
The RECORD of my "contested case" hearing (A#144783 in May 2009)
record was FALSIFIED by deleting the 32 page printed testimony document which the ALJ (Administrative Law Judge Dove Gutman) had ordered (at the hearing) to be part of my sworn testimony.
:
My testimony document was labeled as "closing arguments", which I hope you realize is "lip-flap", neither evidence nor sworn testimony. Thus, my sworn testimony, a lot of it, mostly uncontested, was effectively deleted from the case.
:
Closing arguments may be (and often are) ignored by judges; arguments are neither testimony nor evidence. Thus MY (true,favorable,uncontested) testimony was largely excluded.
:
Another falsification of the case record: One of the complaints against me was replaced (AFTER THE HEARING) with a very different complaint. That new complaint used YOUR question to me regarding
"Did you bill patients?" to claim that I had refused to answer your question. My answer was "No", but was followed by an explanation why I did not consider that line of questioning to be reasonable.
:
My answer was cited anonymously as proof that I had refused to answer your question at the June 2008 investigative meeting, the meeting which you and Dr.Cornelius had supervised. I doubt you know anything about the use of your question. I don't think you provided an affadavit regarding your opinion regarding my "answer".
: I had not refused to answer, I actually had answered your question directly and simply.
: Then tried to explain why the line of questioning was pointless.
:
I know you did not testify at my "contested case hearing", but someone did provide testimony (AFTER the actual hearing was finished) regarding your belief that I had refused to answer, using your question and a falsified version of my answer.
:
Of most importance: The OMB complaints against me, issued in January 2009, prove that THE ONLY PROBLEM was my "prior arrest". The investigation you and Dr.Cornelius were involved in suddenly makes it dramatically clear that Haley has been lying to you about the importance of my arrest- it WAS the reason she inactivated my license. By the time she revealed the truth, you and Dr.Cornelius were excluded from involvement "because you had investigated."
:
I will admit that I did not realize that all the reasonable logical ideas about "practicing enough medicine" were irrelevant, the ONLY problem was my prior arrest. The OMB has never created rules to evaluate "activity". Inactive status is a choice of the licensee, or based on location of practice out of State. License renewal did NOT require any proof of ability or continuing education or practice of medicine. If there had been any rule, you could have read it to me rather than try to think up rules.
: Haley indicated that a licensed expert witness was "practicing enough medicine" to deserve an active medical license. True, but nonsense because she ignored the statutory definition of the practice of medicine.
:
You and Cornelius (and Haley) assured me that there WAS NO COMPLAINT AGAINST ME, but there clearly WAS a complaint- the proof would appear about 6 months later. The idea of evaluating how active I was - is something that was NOT applied to anyone else. You and others also assured me that ANY LICENSEE WOULD BE TREATED THE SAME. But every other licensed doctor was probably "inactive" in many areas of medicine and was NOT required to prove ability in those areas. How did you prove you were qualified to do forceps delivery of a baby?
The IDEA of testing doctors seems good and even "logical"- but the reality is that the OMB does not test individuals unless they have been accused of doing something wrong or badly or negligently. Even ignoring that, the problem was the concealed complaint involving my prior arrest.
And if you continue reading, you will discover how little concern there actually was regarding "my ability". I would be given an ORDER FOR EVALUATION that was impossible for me (or anyone) to comply with, while the true complaint about my arrest remained a secret.
:
Haley created an ORDER FOR EVALUATION! and may have convinced the OMB members to issue it to me - or she may have simply issued it herself without any consultation- I have no way of knowing because OMB operation is secret.
:
Was Haley allowed discretion to issue an OMB ORDER that she intended to use to fine me $10,000? then use that huge threatened fine to obtain a "stipulated agreement" by offering to drop the fine.
:
Spoiler alert: The OMB would agree the ORDER issued against me was impossible for me to comply with. Even so, the OMB found me guilty of intentionally not complying with the impossible Order.
: By deleting my testimony, there was no reason to believe I had attempted to get the ORDER changed (as if that were MY job- to somehow CORRECT the actions that the Board members had approved!)
:
No "evaluation" would have eliminated the complaint based on my prior arrest. The ORDER was issued to provide a complaint against me that seemed easier to prove than an arrest charge that had already been dismissed by a real judge in a real court.
:
The truth was that Haley considered my prior arrest to be an ethical violation that warranted license revocation and a $10,000 fine! That is a CERTAIN fact learned in January 2009. When we are sure of that fact, we can be certain she lied to you, and concealed that from you and Dr.Cornelius (she lied to everyone about it).
:
If you are hoping "maybe Haley learned MORE about that arrest during the 6 month delay"...that idea is disproved by almost any way you want to consider. And does not explain the impossible ORDER Haley obtained against me.
:
I know she lied to you about the state licensing law, which did NOT require any specific activity of a licensee beyond what is listed in the law itself.
:
If the OMB wanted to review my prior arrest, it could have done so! Supposedly YOUR INVESTIGATION did exactly that and considered that my prior arrest was "not a violation". I somehow expect you to want to believe SOME OTHER EXPLANATION but when the truth is revealed, the truth is that there was a litany of lies to me and to you and to literally "everyone", as Haley pursued her own agenda related to my prior arrest and seems to entertains herself by having you question me regarding "activity".
:
My falsified OMB case record was provided to the Oregon Court of Appeals, along with the many falsifications that are in the OMB Final Order for the case. I have no reason to believe the same falsified case record had not already been used by the OMB jurists in deciding the "Final Order" on my case; but that is secret so I can't be totally certain. It would be EASY for the OMB members to determine that now.
:
Because of secrecy, it is possible that Oregon Medical Board member(s) ordered Haley to falsify my case record. Would that actually make any difference in the response to my request that you and the current Board DO THE RIGHT THING= determine my guilt using an HONEST case record.
: I believe that most physicians would NOT falsify a case record. Not then. Certainly not you nor Cornelius, who had been excluded from my case by the time someone decided some of my testimony needed to be removed so judges would not have that truth to consider, only the fabrications that somehow were included.
:
My efforts to deal with this (many many times since it happened years ago) have repeatedly failed. I have assumed my failure was due to the executive director K.Haley. She may still control much of the OMB operations, but I am hoping that she does NOT control you now.
: My prior efforts to communicate may be in my case record or may have been discarded by Haley as irrelevant, but for certain I never received any follow up on any of them.
:
Haley was and is aware of many (all?) the irregularities in the case record, but for years has chosen to consider the situation "unimportant" and "finished". I consider the situation important and unresolved.
:
When I specify Haley for "blame", it is because she definitely knew the truth about what was happening and definitely DID LIE. Because OMB operation is SECRET, I realize that someone else may have been controlling her? and telling her what to do.
:
WHAT I HOPE YOU WILL WANT TO DO:
I hope you can present my suggestions to the OMB members themselves, avoiding lawyers who are controlling the OMB.
Ask that the OMB verify my description of how my case record was falsified by excluding my testimony document, and falsified by adding a complaint after the hearing and fabricating false hearsay evidence to support the added complaing.
:
Ask that the OMB now re-evaluate my contested case A144783 using a true (honest) case record and the actual complaint(s) against me that received hearing.
:
I believe you may have little memory of any of any of this, not because it happened long ago, but because you actually were never informed about the truth of what was happening.
:
For you, your personal involvement probably seemed to begin and end with the investigative meeting of June 2008. You had no reason to think you had not solved "any problem", even as you never actually knew the real problem and your "solution" (the letter to me from the investigative committee) was totally ignored. I can agree your resolution of the situation seems reasonable- UNTIL WE LEARN Haley concealed her actual complaint against me.
: You and others seemed blissfully unaware that Haley's search to learn "was he active enough" was a total sham. By the time she was ready to act on her actual complaint, you and Dr.Cornelius had been removed from being involved ("because you had investigated").
:
The "investigative committee" solution ignored Haley's actual (and only) complaint against me regarding my prior arrest. I could not prove that at that time, but it would become obvious 6 months later as a complaint against me was issued, followed by a claim that it justified license revocation and a $10,000 fine.
:
In retrospect it must have been entertaining for Haley to pretend she had not inactivated my license because of my prior arrest; and more entertaining to listen to the confusion involved in trying to determine "did I practice enough?".
:
You (and others) seem to have been unaware of what actually was happening - I believe that Haley lied to you about almost everything. Later, I doubt you were notified that my simple "No" answer to your question would be used to "convict" me of refusing to answer you... a complaint that did not appear until after the hearing on the actual complaints.
:
There is (and has been) no practical way for me to present my information and request to the Oregon Medical Board. Sending letters does not work, Haley has not replied to them and I doubt anyone else ever sees them. Phone calls (to whom?) would not be adequate because the matter quickly becomes too complicated. I do not want to seem threatening. I would prefer to inform the OMB members myself if there is some way to arrange it. Maybe starting with the content of this letter.
:
I want to believe that you and other physicians do not think it is reasonable to revoke a license and fine me $10,000 using a falsified case record (with my testimony deleted) and a complaint added AFTER the contested case hearing was finished and proved with falsified anonymous pseudo-testimony.
:
:
After that investigative meeting, I received a letter from the investigative committee stating that my license would remain inactive until I provided some kind of proof of competence ... and the letter informed me that there was "no violation". NONE of the three or more ethical complaints against me by Haley were mentioned. They may have also been concealed from others on the committee? I am NOT making this up- it happened.
:
It seems possible that neither of you were told was that there WAS a complaint which explained why my license was inactivated (effectively suspended): Haley considered my prior misdemeanor arrest to be a violation of medical ethics. A SERIOUS violation that should result in license revocation and a $10,000 fine!! despite the fact that the charge against me was dismissed by Judge Marcus in District Court.
:
Actually by the time your involvement in the case was finished, Haley had added TWO additional complaints against me based on your investigative meeting:
1) that I had provided evasive answers and
2) that I had refused to answer.
:
Haley would eventually get the OMB to ISSUE THREE COMPLAINTS AGAINST ME. AFTER the contested case hearing on these ended, on fo them was ignored and a different new complaint was cosidered, without a contested case hearing.
:
EXACTLY WHEN did you learn that my simple answer to you regarding patient billing was MY ethical violation that justified license revocation and a $10,000 fine? Did you learn that NOW? If so, who testified "for you" in order to convict me?
:
YOUR question to me "Did you bill patients" was answered by me with a simple "No", but my answer is claimed (in the OMB Final Order) to be a refusal to answer you. I know I did answer "No". So who provided the testimony that you believed I was "refusing to answer"? I hope that the use of "your testimony" via "hearsay" by some unknown person without a hearing on the complaint... will at least induce you to read the rest of this.
:
At the investigative meeting of June 2008, I assumed that you both (Kirkpatrick and Cornelius) knew what Haley was planning, which is my only excuse for being contentious, suspicious, and upset. I now doubt either of you had any idea you were being fooled.
:
I was very sure I was being lied to in several ways, and what happened eventually did prove I was almost exactly correct. What I did not know was that you both were very UNAWARE of the truth, and would remain so. You had been lied to also. I am hoping that YOU never learned you were being lied to. UNTIL NOW... and I would expect you to hope I am just making it all up, but everything I describe is right there in the OMB case record if you look carefully.
:
You do NOT have to simply trust me to tell the truth. The truth is there, in the case record, but why would anyone bother to read it unless you help me EXPLAIN WHY.
:
After the investigative committee hearing dismissed me, there were at least THREE complaints against me - which is very different from "no violation" that the letter to me suggested! Yet I doubt you knew about any of them.
Why would Haley lie to you and Cornelius? Why did she conceal the complaints?
"What happened next" may explain ?WHY? (spoiler: Haley had a fun idea how to make prosecution easier).
:
I believe that Haley inactivated my license because of my prior arrest, but concealed the truth from me and from you... from everyone. Instead she came up with a fun idea that you and Dr.Cornelius needed to decide if I had been "active enough" to deserve an active medical license, even though there was absolutely no requirement nor any rules regarding "how active" a licensee had to be in 2007. She knew there were no rules regarding this, but may have chosen to explain it to you otherwise.
:
In 2007, renewal of an active license had NO REQUIREMENT for "activity" (you might know that because none was required from you when you renewed your license). This "lack of requirements" explains why neither you nor Cornelius (nor Haley, who was at the investigation) could tell me what was the minimum amount of activity I needed to prove.
:
You both must have realized that you personally did not need to prove some minimum amount of "activity using the license".
:
The letter I received from the investigative committee informed me there was "no violation" - although WHEN THAT LETTER WAS SENT we now know there were at least THREE complaints against me!. Each of them was considered serious enough to justify revocation of my license and a fine of $10,000. They would not be revealed for a few months because first there was a different fun game to play using a Board Order for Evaluation.
:
After that "investigative meeting" which Cornelius and you conducted, Haley threatened me verbally, saying "You will learn what the Board can do legally".
:
Wow, she DID follow up her threat.
:
Haley had something special in mind for me. And I am reasonably sure that most of the OMB physicians did NOT know what was actually happening, nor did she tell them the truth- she lied to them also!
:
Her lie to the OMB (included as a "fact" in the OMB Final Order in the case) was a claim that I had asked to reactivate my medical license. I had not done that- and it is easy to prove I did not request reactivation:= I did NOT apply for reactivation and I did NOT pay any fee which the reactivation application required.
:
Why would she lie about THAT? She and I were both very aware that I did NOT qualify for "reactivation", which has different requirements than renewal of an active license!
Haley was well aware of that also because she had been at the investigative meeting, but she CHOSE to lie in order to make it SEEM necessary to obtain an Order for Evaluation.
:
Everything is secret, but what possible value would any evaluation be if there was no decision to be made regarding reactivation. And the true complaint remains SECRET, not disclosed until Haley can claime I intentionally failed to comply with a Board Order (even though the Order was unnecessary and impossible to comply with- it WAS equivalent to state law FOR ME).
Why why why would the OMB issue an expensive inconvenient and impossible "Order for evaluation" to me when the ONLY problem was my prior arrest? The answer seems simple to me because there is only one possible result of the Order- which is to punish me.
:
I am aware that the OMB can order any evaluation of any licensee at any time for any reason... or for "no reason".
:
But in fact there USUALLY IS A REASON. I believe the reason in my case was "to punish me", because there is no other possible result of the ORDER FOR EVALUATION. If any Board member approved the ORDER, s/he may have thought it was "for evaluation", even though no decision was necessary. I doubt anyone had bothered to learn that CPEP did not provide the evaluations ordered.
But Haley knew that her complaint regarding my prior arrest would still be waiting after any evaluation, so any order would simply be a costly inconvenience for me, and nothing more than that.
:
An evaluation ORDER has the same force as a State law. The "evaluation" that you and Cornelius indicated was optional (if I wanted to reactive my license)- had become an expensive time-consuming difficult REQUIREMENT that carried a $10,000 fine and license revocation if I did not comply with it.
:
Because my license had been inactivated by Haley for reasons related to my arrest- the evaluation you suggested was both unnecessary and unlikely to make any difference in my license status (I doubt you knew that then, but you should know it now).
:
You should realize that because there were the concealed complaints against me- there was no possible "evaluation" or "proof of ability" that was going to allow me to reactivate my license, even if I had wanted to do that.
:
The ONLY PURPOSE of the OFE: I would be punished by the costs and time wasted and inconvenience... or be punished for the vicious crime of not obtaining the unneeded evaluation, then pay $10,000 plus the ignominy of license revocation. Maybe BOTH? Why not?
:
The ORDER FOR EVALUATION that I received in September 2008, a few months after your investigation required "comprehensive evaluation of the ability to practice medicine" AND a "full psychological evaluation".. both to be done by a private company named CPEP in Colorado, which has a website CPEPdoc.org.
:
: It took me about a minute to realize that the ordered evaluation would probably be VERY expensive and inconvenient and time-consuming. I already knew that NO EVALUATION WAS NEEDED and I also knew that the OMB could simply ignore a good evaluation, if I obtained one!
:
What I did NOT realize was that Haley was going to get the OMB to issue her complaint regarding my prior arrest! You had assured me there WAS NO COMPLAINT against me. I believed you! I did not realize that the OFE was simply to make it easier to prosecute.
:
Who would benefit by my evaluation? I wondered if CPEP might have bribed someone to create CPEP income? That was soon proved unlikely when I learned that CPEP did not offer any of the evaluations ordered!
: (Please read that last paragraph again)Phone CPEP yourself and ask- it is really easy to learn the truth.
:
One minute reviewing the CPEP website and I realized facts that I later confirmed in phone conversations with CPEP agents:
1) CPEP does not do ANY psych evaluations and never has ...
and 2) CPEP does not do comprehensive evaluation of the ability to practice medicine. Plus CPEP recomended not doing any of its "practical" evaluations if there is any ethical or moral complaint unresolved (thus ANY and ALL psych problem should be settled FIRST before obtaining a CPEP evaluation). The three concealed complaints against me were all "ethical" in nature.
:
CPEP does do "focused" evaluation of any elements of practice that have been complained about- examples might be record keeping or prescribing antibiotics. The ONLY complaints againse me were secret and related to ethics (prior arrest and answering questions). No complaint regarding medical knowledge nor physical inability to do procedures -- these are the kind of evaluations CPEP offered.
:
I phoned a Board investigator and left a recorded message that the ORDER seemed malicious to me and asked for it to be withdrawn.
At that time, I did not have any proof that the entire "evaluation" idea was a SHAM (because of the concealed ethical violations). I did know that evaluation was unnecessary because there was no decision needed until I asked for reactivation.
:
I did not get a phone call back- I did get a LETTER from the investigator that told me to comply with the ORDER or be prosecuted. By the way, my later testimony about my effort to change the ORDER was deleted from the case record-- and part of the OMB Final Order mentions that I had an ethical duty to somehow get the OMB to change the ORDER, but didn't even try.
:
There is no reasonable way for a Board victim to communicate with Board members- I believe any effort to do so would be considered a threat (by Haley).
Soon after the 90 days allowed for me to obtain the ordered evaluations expired, a 3-part complaint against me was issued by the OMB (without ever contacting me or discussing the ORDER FOR EVALUATION, or anything else).
:
The complaints against me included the original (arrest) complaint you were never told about, and one of the 2 complaints that were based on my answers to your investigation (also complaints that you were never told about) ... the third complaint was "intentional failure to comply with a Board Order".
:
Nobody ever testified that I had failed to comply with a Board Order- I was supposed to provide that testimony and when I did not.. OMB attorney Foote and the ALJ lied about what I said. The actual testimony is in the record, but nobody compared it to the lies they fabricated.
:
The Final Order is FULL of mis-statements, deceptive statements, and outright lies like P20-Line32. The lie was that I made no effort to "change" the September 2008 Order for evaluation. The letter to me from an OMB investigator reflects his reaction to my phone message requesting to change the Order.
:
Board operation is SECRET and I was not provided with any way to discuss the ORDER even if someone thinks I had an ethical requirement to somehow force the Board to do the right thing.
: Plus I had no idea what Board member(s) actually created the Order- it is a wild assumption that ANY Board member had anything to do with creating an unnecessary, punitive Order for evaluation that actually was impossible to comply with! No way for me to find out if Haley did this all herself, or if some Board member was involved.
:
You may already have realized that "sure, the order was unnecessary"... but there MAYBE there were good reasons to issue the Order. There was NO POSSIBLE EVALUATION that was going to benefit me or anyone in any way-- the complaints that had been concealed would NOT disappear even if I managed to spend money and waste time on "evaluations" far from Oregon.
:
We KNOW for sure the complaints were waiting, until the (malicious) "game" with the Order for evaluation was finished.
:
As judges, the Board Members are enormously influenced by prosecuting lawyers, especially the executive director, whom the doctors seem to have always considered trustworthy.
:
I can prove, using my honest case record... that the OMB lawyer Foote and director Haley BOTH LIED TO ME and I really believe they both seemed to really enjoy doing it.
:
And thus I believe they lied to "everyone", but if anyone noticed, they chose to ignore it. I am hoping that you choose to know the truth, and do the right thing.
:
The Jan.2009 OMB complaints against me included:
:
1) prior arrest (I never learned what I was accused of doing or accused of not doing that I should have done).
:
2) evasive answers at investigative meeting
:
3) intentional failure to comply with the Board Order for Evaluation (at CPEP)
:
:
The "evasive answers" complaint was never decided in the Final Order on the case, Instead, I would be found guilty of "refusing to answer questions" and YOUR (Dr.Kirkpatrick's) question regarding patient billing was specifically noted as being proof.
: The case record shows I DID answer, and truthfully. Neither you nor anyone else testified otherwise. Actually, nobody testified against me! The OMB lawyer and the ALJ made up a lot of stuff, and lied about my testimony, but they were NOT under oath. Someone did delete some of my testimony, perhaps to make it easier to provide "ex-parte" testimony for the Board memberd deciding the case? No way for me to know that, it is secret.
:
My (illegally deleted) testimony stated that I had answered all questions honestly. So someone must have provided your testimony as hearsay, based on someone's notes of the meeting- but without ever asking you? (or me). So the case began with both of us uninformed ... and our involvement ended the same way.
:
YOUR question to me regarding "billing", and my answer to you - were mentioned in the OMB Final Order (for my case #A144783) as proof that I had refused to answer questions at the investigative meeting attended by you and Dr.Cornelius (and others).
:
I know you did not testify or provide an affidavit for the hearing- but the OMB judges must have had some reason for believing that I had refused to answer your question and YOU are the only person who actually knows if YOU thought I had answered.
: (My uncontested testimony was that I answered all questions honestly, but that testimony was deleted when the case record was falsified).
:
Below is what I believe was our verbatim exchange at the investigative meeting.
:
At the June 2008 OMB Investigative meeting:
:
(Page 14 Line 26 of the PDF file of the OMB final order)
D.Kirkpatrick (asking Dr.Read): "Did you bill patients?"
RRead: "You mean, send bills to patients? No."
:
After replying "No", I (Dr. Read) continued without being asked another question: "The question is stupid and I should not have to answer it because nobody else has to answer it and there is no complaint and the answer could not possibly explain why my license was inactivated." A very direct and true comment, made AFTER I had answered "No".
:
You may or may not be aware that the OMB members are immune from liability for any and all violations of a licensee's civil rights... but I am hoping that your ethical standards reject a lot of what I describe above and if so, that you will encourage the current Board to evaluate my claims and provide a fair hearing.
:
If the matter of deciding the ACTUAL true case record, I fully expect a Board lawyer to suggest "that cannot be done". However, I am very aware that the OMB CAN DO whatever it pleases - without liability. Some real court may "undo" it later, but why would anyone be upset about "doing the right thing". PLEASE Do not rely on the Board's lawyers to determine "what can be done legally" when it is a matter of showing illegal actions by Board lawyer(s).
:
Haley chose to deceive both you and Dr.Cornelius, both before the investigation... and AFTER the investigation, which had generated at least two more complaints against me. OMB operation is secret so I have no way of knowing if someone else was controlling Haley, but the result would be the same because Haley was the voice of the OMB. I should admit that Haley fooled me also, for a very very long time. Eventually I realized that the pile of lies was not accidental or due to stupidity.
:
There was NO transcript of that investigative meeting because it was NOT a legal procedure; but there were notes taken by an OMB employee in the form of a transcript. Those notes were neither complete nor accurate; nobody ever testified that they were accurate. I know they were NOT accurate in recording my statements.
:
So your actual involvement in "my case" may have ended with your belief that you had found a simple reasonable resolution to the problem of "not practicing enough". I simply needed to prove that I was competent the same easy way you and every doctor does, and then... oh wait, other doctors do not do that... and that would not have eliminated ethical complaints that were being concealed.
:
:
CONCLUSION:
:
I believe it is reasonable for the OMB to determine that my explanations above are correct and that my case record WAS falsified.
:
I believe it is reasonable for the OMB to correct the case record by restoring my testimony document as the hearing ALJ ordered it to be considered to contain direct sworn testimony. And remove the complaint created after the hearing (the one that did not receive any contested case hearing).
Then USE this accurate case record to decide the actual complaints, one of which was never decided. The long time delay should not matter because the jurists are supposed to use ONLY the case record as created by the contested case hearing.
:
:
Again I need to mention, in case you are unaware-- the OMB and the ALJ and the Board lawyer (and both you and Dr.Cornelius) all have been granted immunity for any violation of my civil rights, whether by error or by intentional malice.
:
I would greatly appreciate your help in this matter, and nobody is better positioned to provide that help. You actually should have a very personal interest in helping make sure justice is done.
:
If you are reluctant to believe someone you have trusted would lie to you repeatedly, may I point out that you are not the only one who has been repeatedly fooled by slick lies. It seems that almost everyone except victims have been very thoroughly fooled.
:
No additional information or testimony is needed (not from you and not from anyone)- the facts ARE there already, but have been ignored if they were ever noted.
:
I am willing to help you or anyone else to understand what actually happened USING EXISTING OMB RECORDS, not pseuco-testimony by prosecutors (including Haley) who were NOT under oath.
:
There is no need to "believe me"- the truth is in the OMB records and the falsifications are actually easy to detect and correct.
:
For example, the statement in the Final Order that I first testified that I HAD obtained the evaluations the OMB had ordered. Then "admitted" that I had not obtained them. My actual testimony was totally different from that - I was the only one who knew that the ordered evaluations were IMPOSSIBLE FOR ANYONE TO OBTAIN- that was my defense! Why would I claim I had obtained an evaluation that I could prove was unobtainable by anyone? Nobody noticed that both the ALJ and Foote were simply fabricating useful lies so that my true testimony could be ignored.
:
If someone (lawyer or Board Member) suggests that "The OMB can't do that" (can't re-evaluate a case using a corrected case record), I would point out that the OMB can actually do ANYTHING with respect to licensing that the members consider "right". They are not liable to anyone, but who would complain about honesty?
:
You do not need to believe me in order to consider that it is reasonable to suggest that the OMB determine that my case record #A144783 was falsified and then create a Final Order using a case record that has NOT been falsified.
:
: Very sincerely, Ralph L. Read
:
:
125 SW Collins St.
:
Portland OR 97219
:
503-892-9614
:
:
This letter and some of the relevant documents can be accessed on the internet at ralphread.com/WINTER/index.htm
: